Saturday, November 2, 2013

Twelfth Night


http://www.shakespearebroadway.com/

Saw "Twelfth Night" at the Belasco Theater tonight with Melanie Hanlon and our friend Lisa whose idea it was to see the show, and wow what an amazing production. I was in "Twelfth Night" in college playing Duke Orsino and I thought I'd remember it, but none of it was familiar. (Give me a break, I'm three times older now.) Some of the lines I've heard before but that's because they're quoted often, I didn't remember a thing of the show itself. One thing I know though is, I was horribly inept when I was in the show. I didn't know a thing about the language and a large part of my dialog I memorized by rote and simply recited. It's embarrassing when I think about it now, how little understanding I had of acting at the time. Of course I was in school to learn about acting, and I think I've come a long way, but I'd hate to see today the performance I gave then.

This is such an amazing production. It's a great example of how much a director can bring. There isn't much - if anything - in the way of stage direction in Shakespeare, so the director needs to fill in a lot of the blanks to bring the shows to life. Tim Carroll is the director and he creates a near perfect show here. His inventiveness and the way his ideas always serve the situations and the scenes is astonishing. He never goes against what's written, but finds clever ways to emphasize the text brilliantly, either through comic timing and line emphasis, or by introducing inspired logical and creative wordless action to bring comic moments to life. I'm in awe of the accomplishment of this show.

One challenge with Shakespeare is to make the language communicate to a modern audience unfamiliar with the syntax, and this show succeeds fantastically. Afterwards our friend Lisa said she thinks comedies communicate best of Shakespeare's work and I agree with that. If you can get the comedy right, the audience will follow the gist of the scene even if they don't get every nuance of the language.

This production is SO good, one of the best - and possibly the best - Shakespeare productions I've ever seen, though I admit I don't see a lot of them. It was an absolutely joyous production, and makes me want to see "Richard III" which is in rotation at the Belasco with "Twelfth Night." What a memorable night of theater.

Monday, October 28, 2013


And it's a wrap, the bike has been sold. 

I posted an ad on Craig’s List late Thursday night with the same info I’d put on Facebook recently, and there was a LOT of interest in it. A guy came out Saturday with his buddy’s van so he could take it away, but we couldn’t settle on a price. Yesterday another guy came by and looked at the rust and said his offer would insult me, so I asked how much, and he offered less than half what I was asking, so I sad no, I couldn’t do that. I think he was looking for something in great cosmetic shape so he could flip it, he didn’t seem to care about the mechanics at all, just the appearance.

All in all about ten people responded to the ad. Some people made cash offers site-unseen but a little low. Sunday afternoon I got an email from a guy named Ron asking me to call him. Turns out he was looking for a first bike for his son (in his late 20s, not a kid which I was glad to know) and didn’t want anything too big. Ron is a Harley guy and knows the Sportster is the perfect first bike, very agile and nimble. He’s ridden bikes his whole life and when he saw my bike, it was obvious he was impressed with it. He commented on the rust which I mentioned in the ad and I pointed out how the brake light was also out, something I’d discovered Saturday. I gave him a little off my ask and we made a deal I was very happy with. I went up to my apartment to bring down my toolkit so he could take the old brake light out, and when I got back I overheard him talking to his son on the phone. He said there’s some rust and added, “If you don’t want it, I do!”

He was ready to finish the deal and ride the bike away, but he only had a paycheck from work he wanted to sign over to me with some cash to make up the difference. I said I’d need him to cash it, Melanie said banks can give you a hard time with double-endorsed checks even from businesses. Ron was a little concerned because he was afraid the bike would be sold before he could bring the cash back (this was Sunday night). He REALLY wanted the bike. He ended up leaving $100 as a deposit and I promised him I’d hold the bike and take it off the market until he got back to me. I liked him and he obviously genuinely wanted it, and I liked how he was helping his son with it, it seemed like it’d be a father-son project, so I was comfortable waiting for him.

He ended up having his brother-in-law come by today with the cash and a truck to take the bike away in. That was at around 1:00. So no more bike.

I have mixed feelings about all this, but mainly relief that it’s finally gone. I simply never rode the thing. I’d had it 13 years and only put 9,800 miles on it. I live in Manhattan and riding a bike in Manhattan is just trying to stay alive until you get to where you’re going, it’s miserable. Even Queens was a lousy place to ride when I lived there. Plus I was paying to park it every month, and my desire to take the bike out pretty much went away. I let the insurance lapse in March and hadn’t had the bike inspected in two or three years. The front tire had a slow leak and the battery kept draining because the bike sat idle in the garage, so it became an anchor around my neck instead of something I took pleasure in.

IF Melanie and I had a 2nd home outside the city, then I’d like to have the bike. But I don’t see that happening, not in the near future anyway. We’d both rather get a more expensive place in the city with more space than buy a 2nd home elsewhere, and it’s impossible to keep a bike here, so no dice.

In the end, as much as I enjoyed having the bike and riding it on the few times I’d take it out, I’m relieved to finally get rid of it.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Paul McCartney - New

http://www.allmusic.com/album/new-mw0002578565



Paul McCartney just released a new album, "New," and it's fantastic! 

I don't expect much from McCartney any more. He never had the bite John Lennon had which I preferred, but he's obviously a major artist, and as one of The Beatles, it's a no-brainer I'll follow his career. I haven't been too crazy about any of his albums for a long time. The last one I really enjoy is "Flaming Pie" from 1997, and even that has its weaker moments. Most of the time I'm disappointed with his stuff, he seems to coast on treacly easy-to-write melodies and only has at most a few tracks I really like on his albums. 2007's "Memory Almost Full" is a disappointment, and the album before that, 2005's "Chaos and Creation in the Backyard," is only slightly better.

I haven't sat down to listen to "New" closely yet. I had it on today while I was working from home so it was really just background music, but damn if the thing doesn't kick ass! It's good, I mean really really good. This might even go down as a "classic" Paul McCartney album.

I downloaded the album from HDTracks (https://www.hdtracks.com/), they offer hi-resolution downloads of a good variety of music, and it was only $17.98 including cover art and liner notes. Some of the tracks, though higher resolution than CD, are not really hi-resolution. But I wasn't sure if the vinyl would be any better, and the download was cheaper than the vinyl, so hi-resolution download it was.

I'll probably have more to say about the album later, but for now I can say it's a real surprise and a very strong album. McCartney doesn't just sound rejuvenated, he sounds like he's having fun, and on this album he rocks! I'm very impressed.

To be continued...

Monday, October 21, 2013

End of Watch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_of_Watch



Saw "End of Watch" as a Netflix rental, it's a 2012 movie starring Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Peña as L.A. cops. It's a good flick, very raw and energetic, visceral. The movie is largely hand-held with a consumer video camera feel which is worked into the story with characters videotaping themselves and those around them.  The quality is better than consumer video cameras so it's a case of high-end technology made to look a little ghetto. 

It's a great cop-buddy movie with a thrilling storyline and lots of energy and action. It has a fresh feel to it and keeps you involved throughout. I like this one. I'd been meaning to watch it for a long time and it was worth the wait. 

Jake Gyllenhaal is having an interesting career. He started out playing sort of off-beat outsider parts, then started doing more macho stuff. That started when he bulked up to do some fantasy thing, I forget the title, where he played a sort of swash-buckling character I think. I didn't see the movie but I was surprised to see the change in his persona. Since then he's been playing more "manly" roles, but he does so with more humanity than other action movie actors.

This is a great buddy movie with a convincing and fun rapport between the main characters, and a lot of effective humor. Gritty, raw, funny, and more "real" in feel than most other Hollywood movies. I like this one a lot.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Gravity



Melanie and I saw “Gravity” tonight with Sandra Bullock and George Clooney.  We didn’t see it with Sandra Bullock and George Clooney, Sandra Bullock and George Clooney were in the movie.  We caught a 3D showing at the AMC Theater on Broadway and 84th where the seats are plush leather recliners you can reserve online from a seating chart, very cool.  It’s great knowing whatever time you show up your seats are guaranteed to be empty.  That’s the way to see a movie!


It was great.  If I had to give it a star rating I’d give it 3.5 out of four.  For the story itself I’d give it 3.0 but the effects were so good I’ll go with a 3.5.  I don’t know how they did the weightlessness but it was very convincing and impressive.  There are these amazing long takes where the camera weaves in and out of the floating actors and space shuttle like a bird.  Long takes with moving cameras are impressive to begin with, but combine that with weightlessness and what has to be a lot of other special effects and it’s even more impressive.  The movie isn’t great, but it’s very good.  Ultimately it’s a bit one-note, though there’s a lot of gripping suspense and the film keeps you involved throughout.  It's a pretty good thrill ride all around.  This one will get an Oscar nomination for special effects for sure.

St. Elmo's Fire



I finally got around to watching “St. Elmo’s Fire” a couple of weeks ago, I’d programmed the title into the TiVo and the movie finally played on some channel and the TiVo finally recorded it, so after all these years I finally watched it, and wow did I finally hate everything about it.

Look at these crazy 80s kids and the fun, wacky things they do.  So deep, so mature, so sensitive.  And they always always band together to help each other out.  They’re prescient that way.  Don't you wish they could be your friends too?

God I hated this movie.  I didn’t dislike it, I wasn’t indifferent to it, I hated it.  It’s insulting.  I hope its target audience saw through it and hated it too.  But they didn’t, because this was I hit I think.

It tries to glamorize youth.  We all like youth, and older people wish they could be young again, but youth has never been like the fantasized youth of this bunch.  What’s disturbing is I’m afraid it might have told kids of the day, “This is what your life should be.”  Not only wasn’t the audience’s youth like this, it COULDN’T have been.  This is a fantasy bullshit movie; pandering, cloying, badly executed, and obvious.

OK, other than that, what did I think?  (“But Mrs. Lincoln, the playwright is here, what should we tell him?”)  I like seeing well-known actors so early in their careers.  I wish they’d been in a better vehicle, but they do have charisma and they do impress.  Though not technically a “Brat Pack” movie, this has many of the same players, and it’s fun to see them interact.  Other than that…

It’s shot well?

The script uses correct grammar?

It finally ends?




Top Hat



 

Saw the Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers movie “Top Hat” the other day.  I’m not a big musicals fan, either in movies or in theater (though a perverse part of me still wants to see the Spider-Man musical, mainly because of all the controversy it generated), but I like some of the classics.  “Singing In The Rain” is a great movie period, musical or not, and I love “West Side Story” and, for something more recent, “All That Jazz,” so there are exceptions.  I’ve probably seen “Top Hat” before but I didn’t remember much about it, and it could be I’ve only ever seen excerpts of some of the dances.

“Top Hat” is a fun movie.  It helps to remember this was released in 1935 in the middle of the Great Depression.  I think movies were intended to be more escapist then to remove people from their troubles, and this is a good example of that.  All the characters seem to be independently wealthy, and the sets and costumes are lush and extravagant.  The film creates a kind of dream world you might wish for if you’re wondering how you’re going to pay your rent and where your next meal is coming from.  (These days I guess people escape into drugs instead of movies.)

The plot is only slightly more fleshed out than the average thin movie musical plot of the day.  It’s a classic mistaken-identity tale where Fred Astaire falls for Ginger Rogers but Rodgers thinks he’s married.  Astaire doesn’t know this and the movie follows him trying to woo her and not understanding her stand-off-ishness.  What would 1930s screwball comedies and musicals be without mistaken identities and characters never thinking to say or ask the obvious, like, “But aren’t you married?”  No, too easy, the movie would be over in five minutes.  The movie also has a great turn by the character actor Edward Everett Horton who basically made a career out of the double-take.

The film contains the famous dance sequence where Ginger Rogers wears a dress covered in ostrich feathers.  It looks great and makes a memorable impression, but apparently Astaire hated it.  The feathers kept falling off the dress and clinging to his black tuxedo.  If you watch the dance closely, you’ll occasionally see feathers flying off the dress and falling to the dance floor.  I don’t know how hard it was to get usable takes of that number but the end result is pretty impressive.  Good for you Ginger Rogers for sticking to your guns.

There’s not much else to say about the movie.  It’s light and fluffy and fun, and filled with the kind of stilted artificial acting I usually hate, especially from Astaire.  There isn’t a true or believable moment in anything he does, but then again that was the style then.  I was surprised to see Rogers giving the more natural, believable performance.  I tend to think of her as a little flat and less colorful than Astaire, but after seeing this movie, I realize she gives the more grounded performance to Astaire’s more flamboyant but unconvincing effort.  She’s earthier and less affected, almost Method in her directness.  She doesn’t seem to cater to the camera but plays her scenes with a nice authenticity, even if she does end up being overshadowed by Astaire’s hamming.


All in all, a fun diversion.

Friday, October 4, 2013

"Once" on Broadway

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Once_(musical)


Melanie and I saw the musical "Once" tonight, what a great show. Minimalist staging and sets, but so imaginative at the same time. The story works more effectively in the show than in the movie for some reason, it's more tender and involving, more emotional. (For those who don't know, "Once" is a Broadway musical based on the 2006 indy movie "Once" which won the Academy Award for Best Original Song.)

The music was fantastic and the arrangements were full with maybe 20 people at times playing together from the stage instead of there being a pit band. What's interesting is it takes the form of modern movie musicals where the music is all generated in the scene by musicians you see. In other words, instead of actors breaking into song to a hidden pit band, the actors are also the musicians and sing because they're in a pub performing, or in a recording studio, so the act of singing fits the reality of the story being told. In traditional musicals actors just broke into song, but even Broadway now seems more and more to incorporate the music logically into the story.

Great show, great music, great arrangements, great staging, great production, and great actors. The male lead was a guy who used to be in Doctor Who, he played the part of Rory Williams. His name is Arthur Darvill and he's also Reverend Paul Coates in the first season of the BBC show "Broadchurch." Great job.

Here's the New York Times review:

Another Pint of Melancholy
‘Once,’ With Steve Kazee and Cristin Milioti, at Jacobs Theater

By BEN BRANTLEY
Published: March 18, 2012

Sometimes how cool you look depends on where you’re standing. When I first saw the musical “Once” at the New York Theater Workshop last December, it registered as a little too twee, too conventionally sentimental, for the East Village. Yet on Broadway — at the Bernard B. Jacobs Theater to be exact, where “Once” opened on Sunday night — what is essentially the same production feels as vital and surprising as the early spring that has crept up on Manhattan.

It’s not just that what seems hokey downtown can read quirky in Midtown, where overpriced-ticket buyers tend to prefer familiarity to novelty. True, “Once” — adapted from a wistful low-budget Irish movie about two young songwriters who seem destined to make sweet music together — is exotically modest by the standards of loud, expensively dressed Broadway. But in its new incarnation this musical reveals itself to be a show that was always meant (and probably lusting) for a brighter limelight and a bigger stage. You have to watch out for those shy ones.

In some ways “Once,” which is directed by John Tiffany, has followed a typical route for Broadway musicals, in that it was inspired by a film; and in translating that film to the stage it made the implicit explicit, and the understated overstated. (See “Sister Act” or “Priscilla Queen of the Desert” for corroborating evidence.) I had made the mistake of watching the enchantingly low-key 2006 movie only hours before I first saw the musical downtown. And while there was much I admired in the stage version then, its scaled-up adorability factor got on my nerves.

What annoyed me then — which was mostly inherent in the show’s book, written by the generally terrific playwright Enda Walsh — hasn’t been erased from “Once.” It still has too many lines like “You cannot walk through your life leaving unfinished love behind you.”

But the greater distance between stage and audience that comes with a move to a Broadway house softens the edges of its exaggeration. And what was always wonderful about “Once,” its songs and its staging, has been magnified. In the meantime its appealing stars, Steve Kazee and Cristin Milioti, have only grown in presence and dimensionality. Who would have thought that this soft-spoken little musical would have found itself by raising its voice?

Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti play characters named Guy and Girl (yeah, I know, but bear with me — and them), parts created on screen by Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova, who also wrote the songs (which are used here too). Guy, who is Irish, and Girl, who is Czech, meet in Dublin and discover they share a knack for creating folk-rock tunes that ripple with melancholy and rue.

They’re different too, in complementary ways. Guy’s a brooding quitter; Girl’s a never-say-die doer. And together — with the help of their standard-issue wacky friends — they just might make it after all. Professionally I mean. Romantically they’re both otherwise engaged. Or are they?

You’ve heard it all before, right? Except you haven’t, quite. Because “Once” uses song and dance in a way I’ve never experienced in an American musical (even if its sound will be familiar to alternative radio listeners): to convey a beautiful shimmer of might-have-been regret. Of course the anguish produced by the man or woman that got away has been a staple of musicals and opera for centuries. Heck, it accounts for at least 50 percent of chart-topping pop hits. (Hello, Adele.)

What lends a special, tickling poignancy to Mr. Hansard and Ms. Irglova’s songs is their acceptance of loneliness as an existential given. These are not big ballads that complain angrily about how we could have had it all, you and I. An air of romantic resignation, streaked in minor-key undercurrents, tempers the core heartache of numbers like “Leave,” “When Your Mind’s Made Up” and (the Oscar winner for best song from the movie) “Falling Slowly.” (Martin Lowe is the excellent music supervisor and orchestrator.)

And because every member of the ensemble here is a musician, functioning as both the show’s band and its cast of characters, this savory-sweet sadness feels both organic and universal. (Bob Crowley’s single set, given multifarious life by Natasha Katz’s expert lighting, suggests the kind of pub where people come to lose themselves in song as well as drink, and the audience is invited to join in an improvised preshow hootenanny on the stage.)

This is not music that lends itself to the usual chorus-line kicks and shimmies. Instead, Steven Hoggett (who collaborated with Mr. Tiffany on the National Theater of Scotland’s marvelous men-at-war play “Black Watch”) sets the songs to stylized physical movements that are as distinctive and evocative as any Broadway choreography since Bill T. Jones’s work on “Spring Awakening.”

Sometimes Mr. Hoggett sends his performers into spirited hoedowns, featuring amiably dueling violinists and dancing on tables. More often they move with calculated tentativeness, in reaching gestures that summon infinite, thwarted longing. A number performed by Ms. Milioti in this vein, “If You Want Me” — sung with Erikka Walsh and Elizabeth A. Davis — is a gentle knockout; so is the first-act curtain number led by Mr. Kazee.

The supporting cast members are especially fine in their musical performances. (Some of their hoarier repeated jokes and outsize eccentricities I could do without, but that’s not their fault.) And Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti, who were fine off Broadway, have taken on the glow required by Broadway stars. Mr. Kazee manages to find a soulful, quietly erotic energy in his passive character, and his singing voice shifts by stealthy degrees from tuneful plaintiveness to howling pain.

It’s not easy playing a winsome life force with a foreign accent. But Ms. Milioti has mastered the assignment brilliantly. She brings a new confidence to her portrayal, and an enhanced mixture of wit and wisdom, which suggests a maturity in youth, a fatalism hard won during an Eastern European childhood. And together she and Mr. Kazee exude a chemistry that is all the more achingly real for being so subdued.

“Once” features another rarity in a Broadway show: amplification that enhances rather than distorts the music. (Clive Goodwin is the sound designer.) When the violins begin to play in “Once” — and the accordion and the mandolin and the guitars and the cello — the instruments swell into a collection of distinctive voices melded into a single, universal feeling. That’s the sense, carried in the corners of all human hearts, that we just missed out on the real thing. “Once” massages that feeling until it hurts quite exquisitely.

Saturday, September 28, 2013

The Thin Red Line (1998)





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thin_Red_Line_(1998_film)

I've been on standby for work all last week and this weekend, meaning I need to stay close to my computer in case I get a call and have to log in to our system. Which means I've been home every night last week and all this weekend. Which means I'm watching a lot of TV and movies while Melanie runs around doing other things.

Today I watched "The Bride of Frankenstein" from 1935, "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" from 1962, and "The Thin Red Line" from 1998.

I thought I'd seen "The Thin Red Line" before, but nothing was familiar about it, so I guess not. I didn't realize it was a Terrence Malick film, or maybe I'd forgotten, and I'm pretty impressed by it. It's the kind of movie that doesn't need a review so much as a dissertation. Elegant, poetic, thoughtful, intelligent, philosophical, kind of spacey in a way (in a good way) because it's more about emotion, life, and feeling than plot. Not that it's plotless, but the story isn't really the point. It's kind of an examination of life and war and nature, and is really special. I don't always go for these kinds of movies, but I love this one. 

It helps that I've seen Malick's "Tree of Life," another meditation on life, so I recognize the filmmaker's vibe. "The Thin Red Line" is a little more grounded than "Tree of Life" and that's a good thing, but it's still very meditative. Roger Ebert said, "Actors like Sean Penn, John Cusack, Jim Caviezel and Ben Chaplin find the perfect tone for scenes of a few seconds or a minute, and then are dropped before a rhythm can be established." I disagree. I like the movie more than Ebert did (he gave it three stars). I think it's easy to expect a more conventional film with more conventional rhythms when a movie is linked to a genre, the war movie, but you can't say this film lacks or has disjointed rhythms. I think the whole thing goes along at its own pace and weaves in and out of lives almost languorously and absolutely not without rhythm, it kind of swoops in and out like a bird. Maybe it's a little disjointed in a standard narrative sense, but it does hold together within its own logic. You don't always know at first if one sequence immediately follows another or maybe precedes it, and we get flashbacks from some of the characters mixed in with the "present" action, but I like that, it creates a mood rather than a strictly linear plot. Perhaps Ebert was reacting to the difficult production the movie had; its first cut was five hours long and it took months to get it down to its current three-hour running time. But I don't think the final cut is fragmented, I think it's a whole that works very well and has a kind of grace to it. Very interesting movie, I liked it very much. It also depicts battles, war, in a way that seems more convincing than other war movies I can think of. Nothing is glorified and it doesn't have that kind of artificial or stylized Hollywood look other war movies have. Great flick.

"Liberty Valance" was OK, but I'm not a big western fan. I wanted to watch it because it's so famous and influential, and I liked it more than a lot of other westerns from the 40s and 50s (this is a bit later from 1962), but I'm not the best audience for it. I enjoyed the cast and it was fun to see Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne in a film together, I think it was the first (and only?) time that happened. And it looked great, but it was only OK.

I probably have about 30 more movies backed up in my TiVo. I'll read about an interesting movie and then punch the title into the TiVo. Whenever the movie shows up on cable, the TiVo records it. Lately I'm working my way through the list starting with the movie that's been in the que the longest and going forward. Next up is "Bring Me The Head of Alfredo Garcia."